Søk i stiler
 

American Health Care System vs Norwegian Health Care System


"Term paper" i engelsk om helsesystemet i USA sammenlignet med det norske.
Sjanger:TemaoppgaveLastet opp:28.03.2005
Språkform:EngelskForfatter:Anonym
Tema:Helse
Makt og politikk
Verktøy:Utskrift   Del på Facebook
Bilder: Denne oppgaven inneholder bilder.
Logg inn via Facebook for å se dem.



Introduction:

This assignment (project) is mainly about the Health Care System in the United States of America. Reason for why I have chosen this topic is because I am very interested in health matters generally because many of my closest friends are professionals in this field and we often discuss topics concerning health and thing related to this topic. My knowledge about the American system is very short at this time. My goal is to learn about how the health system is functioning in United States of America. I hope that I will achieve some knowledge about the health system over there when I have completed this assignment. I will try to describe how the system is functioning and its influences towards the social welfare system. I will also shortly describe the functioning of the Norwegian System and how it is build up. I,ll try to compare these two systems with each other and make a conclusion about which system I believe is the best for the society generally. I will also give an opinion about which system of mentioned above is best to live in where i would prefer to spend my and my children,s life in.

 

Since there are many common aspects between American culture and way of living compared with Norway, therefore it is naturally to compare these to countries on this topic.

 

“ Should Health Care be available equally to everyone?”.

 

The American Health Care system

The American health care system is totally different compared to the health services in Norway. Whenever a citizen have any need for assistant concerning health services, the government provides it immediately and covers all costs that are caused by that in Norway. The American system is based on a different structure where things work totally different. If you unfortunately needs any assistance concerning health matters in USA you are in that situation totally dependent of a health insurance (I,ll describe this phenomenon some later in this assignment).

 

Cost of the treatment is very high for everyone who needs medical care. American hospitals are in general well-equipped and efficient with the latest technology and high level of treatment in different medical fields. The doctors earn incomes is far above the general average in America. There is strong prejudice against “socialized medicine” (especially among doctors).

 

What does “socialized medicine” means?. It is a public system of national health insurance where doctors are usually paid for their services by the government, and everyone is eligible for medical care without any pre-existing condition. Most European countries have some form of socialized medicine. In America there is only two federal health insurance programmes. Those are Medicare and Medicaid.

 

In 1965, the Social Security Act established both Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare was a responsibility of the Social Security Administration (SSA), while Federal assistance to the State Medicaid programs was administered by the Social and Rehabilitation Service (SRS). SSA and SRS were agencies in the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare(HEW). In 1977, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) was created under HEW to effectively coordinate Medicare and Medicaid. In 1980 HEW was divided into the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In 2001, HCFA was renamed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

 

Medicare; provides nearly free treatment for the elderly and retired people. Elderly people do not recover the full cost of some types of treatment that are expensive. People age 65 or older, some people under age 65 with disabilities, People with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), which is permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant.

 

This category of people represents 12.3% of the U.S. population, about one in every eight Americans. By 2030, there will be about 71.5 million older persons, more than twice their number in 2000. People 65+ represented 12.4% of the population in the year 2000 but are expected to grow to be 20% of the population by 2030. Even so the cost of Medicare to federal funds rose to billions.

 

Medicaid; This is a program that pays for medical assistance for poor people and families with low incomes and resources. This program came at the same time as Medicare program and became law in 1965 and is funded by the Federal and State governments to assist states in providing medical long-term care assistance to people who meet certain eligibility criteria. Medicaid is the largest source of funding for medical and health-related services for people with limited income.

 

The rest of the population such as working people and their families are responsible for their health by them self and are therefore normally insured by private schemes against the cost of treatment and against possible loss of earnings if they get ill. There are a lot of HMOs and PPOs who makes big money from workers because of their anxiety to get ill and the costs an illness brings. This has become a big business in USA today. This types of schemes are often operated by deductions of earnings from wages and salaries. A new post-election survey says that almost two-thirds of Americans say that lowering the costs of health care and health insurance should be a top priority for President Bush and Congress in 2005.

 

What is HMOs and PPOs?

HMO is a health maintenance organization that provides comprehensive health care to a voluntarily enrolled population at a predetermined price. Members pay fixed, periodic fees directly to the HMO and in return receive health care services as often as needed.

PPO is a preferred provider organization that associates contracts with a group of doctors, dentists, hospitals or other health care service providers to provide care at prearranged rates or discounts.

 

The American Health care system is the most expensive system in the world. In 2002 Americans spent $ 2000 per person annually on healthcare where of roughly half was for insurance, a quarter for drugs and medical supplies and a quarter for medical services. Americans use 12 percent of the gross national product to pay for medical care, and yet in the year 2003 some data from the Census Bureau show that " 45.0 million people in the United States had no health insurance coverage. Almost 8.4 million American children are uninsured as well. These people don't have medical coverage because they can't afford it. People who do have some form of medical coverage are often unaware of the hidden costs dictated by the private insurance companies.

 

Insurance systems works like this:

I will now try to design a picture of how the insurance system is functioning in America. Mr. Thomas Olsen is a Texas based construction worker. Thomas (38) is married to Eli (32). They have two kids, Daniel and Chris and they are 7 and 9 years old. Mr. Thomas pays approximately $ 500 to the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). It is the owner of the construction company (his employer) who has provided him this service. In addition to this does his wife pay approximately $ 250. This fee will cover almost everything (excepting to special medications) his family will need in case of medical assistance. Thomas has chosen his own so called primary care physician. This is the doctor they visit for routine check-ups and the doctor they visit if they get ill. This doctor is also responsible to arrange check-up with a specialist for Thomas and his family if that is required. Every treatment prescribed by the primary care physician is covered by HMO insurance.

 

Here is a little summary of what the family can get from their insurance policy:

Thomas receives $ 150 of covered physician care in two visits.

Eli receives $ 350 of covered physician care in 5 visits.

Chris receives $ 800 of covered physician services in 16 visits, $ 3 000 covered surgery, and $ 10 000 in covered hospital charges, all in network.

Daniel receives covered physician charges of $ 300 in 6 visits.

(This example is taken from one the biggest insurance organizations in Us)

 

Public or Private

It seems to me that majority of consumer of the health services in America are unsatisfied with todays healthcare system. I have figured it out from the literature that i have collected concerning this important issue. Many people are of this opinion that the health care system has serious problems. People says that the current system is an not including system and neither the public system or private but a restricted market. This means that the insurance industry is a large group of profit seeking firms who is doing whatever to run their businesses at consumers expence.

 

The former democrat president of United States Bill Clinton suggested to change the system following European and Canadian models. But the lobbying campaigns from Republicans, The American Medical Association and Insurance industry caused that he failed to get sufficient political support in the Congress.

 

I believe that health care should be available to anyone and especially in America, the richest country in the world. All citizens deserve good and affordable medical coverage, but this is not the situation in America. The Americans should adopt a public health care system instead of private. I believe there is more fairness and equality as consequence to having a public medical care system and it ensures that all people have access to affordable, high quality and reliable health care. Including those 45 million people who did not have any insurance of health coverage. Today there are too many Americans who have lack of health coverage because their income, their gender, the colour of skin or disability. A Public Health Care system will eliminate this discrimination and this system will also impact on the bureaucracy in HMOs and give consumers free-choice to switch between the marked alternatives and freedom of choosing their own doctor and have access to the specialists they wish to see.

 

I would like to state a conclusion that a Study of inequalities in healthcare came with in Chicago: It reflects the situation of current health care system very well.

 

What is it to be sick and poor in the United States? It depends on how sick, how poor and how old you are. It depends where you live. It depends on colour of you skin. It depends on your sex. If you are either very poor, blind, disabled, over 65, male, white or living in a middle or upper class neighborhood in a large urban center, you belong to a privileged class of healthcare recipients, and your chances of survival are good. But, if you are none of these, if you are only average poor, under 65, female, black, or live in a low income urban neighborhood, small town, or rural area, you are a disenfranchised citizen as far as health rights go and your chances of survival are not good.

 

Today in the American health care system you're more alone and more at risk than you probably realize. This is a system growing more dysfunctional - and more hostile

by the day.

 

The Norwegian Health Care System

I will now try to describe shortly how the Norwegian Health Care system is build up and functioning. We can call the Norwegian system for socialized medicine.

 

All worker's pay a tax from monthly salary to cover not only medical care but the welfare programs as well. The Norwegian health care system is mostly publicly funded. The central government provides grants to the counties who redirects finance to the hospital sector. The municipalities also receive grants from the central authorities, and largely fund the primary health care system. The state-run National Insurance Scheme (NIS), created in 1967. It offers public insurance against individual medical expenses (fees for service) for ambulatory care provided by hospitals and private practitioners.

 

In addition to this hospitals have some income from patient's charges for ambulatory care and transfers from other counties to cover the cost of the treatment of non-resident “guest” patients.

 

In addition to the public hospital sector there is also small private hospitals consisting of five very small private hospitals with outpatient clinics in Oslo. This sector is representing less than 1 per cent of the total number of hospital beds and 5 per cent of the outpatient services provided in Norway. These private clinics have specialised in open heart surgery, hip surgery and minor surgery such as arthroscopy, inguinal hernia, cataracts, sterilisation and varicose vein operations, because of to long waiting lists for this type of health care at public hospitals. Norwegian law imposes tight restrictions for establishing private hospitals like this. Some medical laboratories and x-ray institutes are also private. Specialists can engage in private practice (with their fees partly reimbursed by the social insurance system), part-time or fulltime, although the hospitals employ the majority of specialists.

 

Some private commercial hospitals are financed only by patient co-payments, NIS reimbursements and contract-based grants from the counties.

 

Conclusion:

I believe that the health care system problem in America compared to Norway is complex. It is hard to find the perfect program, which might not even exist, but americans should look for better solutions and try to implement them. They can't just be negative to the new proposals. For instance, maybe President Clinton's plan would work, but they will never know because congress rejected it. President Clinton's plan would cover all the 45 million uninsured people. I think this plan is worth reviewing. Also, they have to learn how to cooperate. Politicians should put aside their political differences, insurance companies and the doctors should stop thinking only about their financial benefits. I strongly believe that concentrating on what's best for America will lead to the creation of a better health care system.

 

General conclusion:

I asked a question in my introduction, “ Should Health Care be available equally to everyone?”.

My opinion and answer for this question is YES, off course health care should be available equally to everyone. It is a responsibility of the whole community that all cictizens get the necessary treatment when they get ill. Especially in countries like USA and Norway. These are among worlds richest countries and should afford it.

 

I think America should consider a health care system similar to health care systems in the other European countries and Canada. The American system is very bureaucratic and it only strengthens the class distinctions. In Norway we have a history of strong solidarity and economical equality. Even if we are privileged and have high standard if living, we should remember that there will always exist people who are not fitting into the society and earn their own money. A health care system built on an American model will create an elite who can afford to get ill. Is this type of society we wants our children to grow up in? NOT me ;-))!!

 

 

Bibliographical references

 

Books:

David E. Nye, Contemporary American Society, Akademisk Forlag, 2003.

Mauk, David & Oakland John, American civilization, Routledge, 1995

Bromhead Peter, Life in America, Longman, 1994

 

Articles:

Robert K. Oldham, Why Deny Health Care?, March 1989 issue of The Freeman.

 

Internet:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/healthcare/

http://www.yourdoctorinthefamily.com

http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/medicare/health-care/

http://www.healthinsurance.org/

http://www.theadvocates.org/freeman/8903oldh.html

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/researchers/statsdata.asp

http://www.johnkerry.com

http://www.georgewbush.com

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthins/hlthin03/hlth03asc.html

http://www.oecd.org

http://www.norge.no

 

 

<bilde>

Logg inn for å se bildet


Kommentarer fra brukere


En gang i blant skrives det kommentarer som mangler seriøsitet eller som ikke har noe med oppgavens tema å gjøre. Hjelp oss å rydde! Klikk 'varsle' nederst til høyre på de meldinger du mener må bort. Så fjerner redaksjonen kommentarene etter hvert.

meg
14.12.2005 16:08

Bra!
4
anbefalinger
jeg orker ikke å lese så mye

vinni
18.05.2012 00:26

Bra!
3
anbefalinger
Even though this post is quite old, I thought I could give my 2c to this topic from my experience. I am neither American, nor Norwegian but I live in Norway. From my experience of living Norway for 2 years, every time I needed medical attention, I have to go to only my personal doctor. Who often cannot see me because he is busy when I really need to see a doctor (for illnesses like flu). Other option is I go to Legevakten (emergency hospital), in Legevakten they have sent me home saying drink lots of water and take over the counter medicines without testing anything!! I don't need medical professionals to tell me those things I am not coming from a cave not to know that. obviously I always try those things first and then go to the doctor (I avoid visiting doctors as much as possible). Other times I have been made to wait for hours without having any definitive answer from the doctor. I am guessing all they had to do was prescribe some antibiotics. Instead they left my immune system to fight the infection slowly and painfully.

Another thing is any dental care in Norway is not covered by Norwegian health care. So we are screwed!!! I had a bit of bad luck with my teeth as well. My tooth was sensitive and painful I visited a dentist, after several visits the dentist kept saying there is nothing wrong with the tooth. Each visit costs 1000NOK (around 170USD) I suspected a cracked tooth, informed my dentist still he was stuck to his theory and did nothing about it. Finally after lots of decay and unbareble pain, it was confirmed that it was a cracked tooth and it needed root filling which costs around 10000NOK (1700USD) half way through the treatment dentist decided it is not possible to keep the tooth and had to be extracted. After spending almost 10000NOK I lost the tooth. Not sure if I could sue the dentist for this. Now I am considering an implant which costs 25000NOK!!! Funny thing is I am not allowed to buy a dental insurance myself. Really, whats wrong with Nowegian system why aren't we allowed to have dental insurance? and why the f*** its not covered by the Norwegian healthcare if we are not allowed to buy dental insurance?

I have never been to US so obviously I cannot compare. But to me it looks like even though its free healthcare for everyone in Norway, the service is not as good as Norwegians boast about it. I am not speaking in relative terms but from my experience. I come from a third world country and I have better experience from my country. I am not sure why Norwegians are so much biased about their healthcare probably they are used to their system so much they dont like anything else. Some comments here raise perfectly valid points, lack of medical professionals is a serious limitation to the healthcare system. I believe with my education and skills anywhere in the world I can earn enough to buy heath insurance for myself and my family. I feel with Norwegian heathcare its a downgrade for me. I dont want a free health care rather I want quality with subsidized prices (if possible) and freedom to go to any doctor I want on any day. As far as this article goes if I was his/her professor I would give no better than a D. It is lacking any qualitative comparison just focuses on monetary aspects. Even otherwise poor writing and lack of depth is a minus.

MEGABRA!
24.04.2007 20:05

Bra!
2
anbefalinger
Formidabelt! Sensasjonelt! Dette temaet og problemstillingen kunne ikke vært argumentert bedre, tror jeg! Hvilken karakter fikk du?

Erik
05.10.2007 22:49

Bra!
2
anbefalinger
Megabra var å ta veldig sterkt i. Innholdet var greit nok, men det var lite flyt i språket, en god del skrivefeil, og konklusjonen er for enkel og naiv... Går du et av de første årene på ungdomsskolen så er besvarelsen sikkert bra, men går du på VGS så tror jeg ikke du bør levere inn noe slikt som det der om du satser på noe over 3 eller 4.

John
12.11.2008 23:04

Bra!
2
anbefalinger
I Have to agree with the comments that PK writes and add that your paper is terrible by university standards. Biased and lacking real facts. Im a half norsk American who has been living in Norway about 9 years. Norwaegian hospitals will see you immidiatly, then put you on a waiting list, or just let nature take its course. Try getting an appointment with a gynacologist, long waiting list. My sister in law cant have a secound child, took 6 months to see a gynacologist about that. My wife was in labor for 61 hours with our first child. the MIDWIFE gave her parecet and told her to go home on three occasions during this labor, found out the parecet is a no no. then when we are allowed in the hospital. the MIDWIFE gives too much pain drugs to my wife, which reduces the strenght of the contractions, try pushing one out after 61 hours without sleep and reduced contractions. finaly a real doctor arrives, cant see a head crownining, but deciceds to go in and secure a suction cup to my childs head. Next, Ill never forget seeing that female doctor leaning back on her HEALS pulling that stainless steel chain with all she had, but it was no use. I started cursing those jackasses, because they wouldnt do anything during the previouse 3 months that my wife had been complaining about major pains in here belly. when the doctor heard me cursing and telling them they dont know the facts, thats when they took her in for emergency C section. then the epideral shot in the spine coused my wife to scream bloody murder, after three attempts, they gave up on that . My wife says she could feel the epideral shot from her spine down thru her legs, not normal. So my wife had a c-section without an epideral, just drugs. she tells me she could hear the babies first cries of its life when it was born. She was awake . ANYWAY, it seems Norwegian state has a big problem to find healthcare workers, seems few are willing to take a long education when the salary they will recieve isnt much more than the average joe on the street(big middle class, small upperclass) . Incentives give peaple a reason to try harder, work harder, Improve society. I dont see much incentive in Norway, only coffee breaks, company meeting, vacations, sickdays off to visit the day care and so on. So just keep waving your flags.yeah. America will get its socialized healthcare, I know it with certainty. Im just your average middle class joe in America, and I trust my Healthcare in America far and beyound anything Norway can deliver to me. Just a note to you, dont be SHEAPLE, learn to QUESTION AUTHORITY and challenge your polititians when they dont deliver the goods. Im mad as hell and Im note going to take it anymore.


26.02.2009 17:24

Bra!
1
anbefalinger
What a Bias paper, i guess just Norwegian centric. I for one would rather use the US heathcare system. It has superior service and technology. Thats the benefit of private, more expensive services, growth and innovation You are always able to see a doctor when you want, pay or under insurance. and in Oregon the Medicaid for the poor is fantastic. Top quality Dr's. When in Norway, i couldnt believe the disregard of simple safety practices. Workers in the USa usually get the insurance cost deducted from their paycheck...just like norway it is deducted from paycheck (although in Norway the deduction is in the form of taxes) Also in the USA, sometimes employers will pay for heathcare. I am sick of Norwegians saying to me, that their system is the best.


26.02.2009 17:33

Bra!
1
anbefalinger
by the way there are positives and negatives to both, nobody's better just different..It is dependant on your personal preferences.....i thought you norwegians had the Jante Laven which states "no ones better than anyone else." Wouldnt gloating in Norwegian health care system be illegal for you?  Wink ;-\)


02.06.2009 04:49

Bra!
1
anbefalinger
I'm just doing my own research (for my own knowledge not for school) on this same subject. It's hard to write fairly about any subject without personal bias, but I would start by documenting the good and bad for both topics. Our American care system is complicated largely due to all of the government regulation of the system. Also, we have large instances of individuals suing doctors/hospitals for millions of dollars when they made a mistake. The man who's wife was apparently mistreated during labor would be a millionaire in America. To protect against mistakes (malpractice), doctors order dozens of tests which are often not necessary, and this contributes to the large cost. Also, as another person here said, hospitals do NOT refuse care to anyone, so if there is an emergency, a poor person is still given equal care regardless of whether or not they can pay. Hospitals charge riduclous fees (like $20 for an aspirin) to offset the poor people who cannot pay their bills. Anyway, this is just more information on our American system and why it is so costly.

I see this post is from 2005, but if you are still looking into this subject, maybe you could focus on the results of our system. Such as, what is the survival rate in each country of breast cancer? What is the survival rate of various heart disease, etc? Thanks.


22.02.2012 23:08

Bra!
1
anbefalinger
I have lived in canada , the u.s and I am a Norwegian citizen.
Anyone who is American or canadian (canada has a better helth system than the u.s) , who have not been to Norway can not compare the helthcare system to Norway.
All you need to know is that the helthcare system in Norway is one of the best in the world and the u.s health care system is by far vorse. Go to the white house human development program or look at the U.N livingstandard position of the u.s compared to Norway. You will find Norway on top and the u.s way down the list. It does not matter what any American try to say on good helthcare system Norway V.s the u.s. Look at Mr moore´s movie sicko and look up the part about Norway that is cut out of the movie in the u.s.

hei
01.10.2009 06:10

Bra!
0
anbefalinger
Interesting discussion. I am Norwegian living in the US. Id rather go to a us doctor. Too long waiting lists and underqualified doctors in Norway. U.S. hospitals provide better service, I believe than in many other countries, although it is horrible that so many are without health insurance in the US. About 5 million people living in Norway, many more Americans don't have a health insurance. Generally people live better in Norway (and in most European countries) but when it comes to this topic I'd rather go to an American doctor. People need to stop voting for the red parties. Vote blue/ borgerlig, not red cause they won't make any changes. I was really hoping this election would change things but too many people are too satisfied with how it is, since they don't know what its like being on the other side. I always hear that we have the best healt care system, but I don't understand then why so many people have to go to other countries to get treatment or wait for months. Is simply because we have to pay ca 40 % in taxes that we get "free" insurance. Back to the core: I would rather be hospitalized in the US with my insurance, although I'd prefer Norway in many other ways.


Legg inn en melding!
Obs! Meldinger som ikke omhandler oppgavens innhold slettes. Det samme gjelder meldinger uten stor grad av saklighet.
Ditt navn      Din e-mail (valgfritt)
Din kommentar (HTML-tagger fjernes)





På forsiden nå!

Lyktes med Shakira-fleipen

Torsdag skal Shakira angivelig ha blitt mor til en liten gutt, hevdet kjæresten og toppfotballspilleren Gerard Pique - og lyktes med Twitter-spøken.

Les hele saken

   

Holmes tas av tidlig

Katie Holmes opplever nå at teaterforestillingen som er hennes første store oppdrag etter skilsmissen fra Tom Cruise, blir tatt av - svært tidlig.

Les hele saken







 
Req.time: 0.030 sec - 1 pageviews